- Abiotic Factors -
Biological Factors
Human-induced limiting factors
- Veterinary control measures: Veterinary
fences are probably the single most important determinant
of buffalo distribution and numbers within Namibia and
across the entire subregion.
Large parts of the potential range (Figure
14) are not available to buffalo and within the allowed
range many populations are becoming totally isolated as
a result of the placement of fences (Figure
10).
- Land Use Planning:
Within the Caprivi and northern Botswana, the de facto
location of human communities and their cattle not only
dictates the application of veterinary measures but also
results in direct competition with buffalo for land and
grazing resources.
back to
top
- Fragmentation: The subpopulation in the west
of the Caprivi (Mahango and the western "Core
Area") is effectively isolated from other buffalo
in the Caprivi by lack of water in the central part of
the Caprivi Game Reserve and it is also effectively isolated
from Botswana by the veterinary
fence (Figure
10). In the extreme western Caprivi a large part of
the potential range is denied to buffalo by the settlement
on both banks of the Kavango River north of the main road.
If settlement and subsistence agriculture continue to
develop in the vicinity of the Kwando River in Namibia,
the buffalo populations in Mamili, Mudumu and the western
"Core Area"
of Caprivi Game Reserve (Figure
14) will become isolated subpopulations linked only
through Botswana. In the area east of the Kwando River
'ribbon' subsistence cropping restricts buffalo access
to water and creates a barrier to the Forest Reserve to
the east. Settlement between Mudumu National Park and
the conservancies to the north and along the southern
boundary of the Forest Reserve is creating a barrier which
will separate 'southern' buffalo from 'northern' buffalo.
Settlement along the northern boundary of Mamili National
Park will soon isolate this buffalo population completely.If
the Salambala Conservancy is ever to maintain a sustainable
buffalo population, it will come about through colonisation
from Botswana across the Chobe River rather than through
any eastwards migration of buffalo from Mamili or Mudumu.
However, the potential buffalo range (Figure
14) along the Chobe River is severely threatened by
an almost continuous belt of settlement.
back to top
- Fires have always been an important and natural
process, and it is often argued that they have important
benefits to plant communities.In recent years, however,
the number of fires set has increased as human populations
have grown, so areas get burnt much more frequently.
Mendelsohn and Roberts (1997, pages 24-25) present
a compelling picture of the gravity of the fire situation
in Caprivi with burns commencing as early as April
each year and continuing until December when over
60% of the vegetation has been burnt and the total
count of individual fires may have exceeded 3,000.
Fire management is needed to control this situation.
It seems that at one time there was an extensive network
of firebreaks in the Caprivi to control fires and
it would obviously be beneficial if these could be
resuscitated.
back to top
- Illegal Hunting: Although there is undoubtedly
a high level of illegal
offtake in the
project area (in parts of Angola this hunting may
be totally unsustainable), this may be less important
than the previous factors. The illegal hunting is carried
out in situations where the
higher-valued uses of buffalo cannot be realised due
to lack of empowerment
over natural resources, the failure to develop management
institutions and a lack of incentives for conservation.
Abiotic limiting factors
Back to top
Buffalo are regulated by their food supply - more particularly,
it is the decline in quality and quantity of available food
below the minimum maintenance level required by buffalo
during the dry season that limits the population (Sinclair
1975).
- Rainfall (Figure
6) is the primary driving vector which affects
- surface water: notwithstanding
any food production
as a result of good rainfall, habitats
may be rendered unavailable to buffalo if there is
insufficient surface water. The development of game
water supplies in the large Kalahari Sands area of
the Western Caprivi Game Reserve would not only address
this problem but would also allow the persistence
of buffalo populations in areas away from the main
rivers on a perennial basis. The difficulties of doing
this are not underestimated: Mendelsohn and Roberts
(1997, p. 39) show the average depth of water below
the surface in western Caprivi as varying from as
much as 300 metres in the west of the Caprivi Strip
to 35 metres in the east. A number of boreholes have
been sunk in the area but most are non-functional
and would not provide the water needed for large buffalo
herds.
- the overall carrying capacity of land (Figure
7) for buffalo through food production;
- Nutrition effects the fecundity
of female buffalo;
- the maximum growth
rate of buffalo populations;
- Soil fertility influences overall food
production to a secondary extent.
- Temperature is a determinant of buffalo
behaviour in that they are obliged to seek shade whenever
temperatures exceed a certain threshold.
Biological limiting
factors
Back to top
- Inter-specific competition:
Sinclair (1974c) states that buffalo populations are
regulated by adult mortality caused by undernutrition
as a result of food shortage. Food shortage, in turn,
is caused by intra- and inter-specific competition.
Both inter-specific and intra-specific competition
for food are the ultimate factors regulating buffalo
populations. Sinclair points out that a population
of any species is effectively competing with another
species if it eats any of the food required by that
species. If the population of one species is large it
can have a marked impact on the smaller population of
the other species. In the Serengeti, wildebeest were
in large numbers and were responsible for depleting
the resources of buffalo. The large elephant population
(5,000-10,000 animals) in the Caprivi might be responsible
for a reduced
food supply. In areas where annual rainfall is 500-600
mm, elephant densities greater than 1/km2 result in
marked changes to woody vegetation and it can be presumed
that the grazing sward is also affected. There have
been no population reductions of elephant in either
northern Botswana or Caprivi as part of ecosystem management
in recent times (if ever) and this management option
could be considered. It is a topic which should be discussed
jointly with the Botswana authorities.
Coe, Cumming and Philipson (1976) noted that it was
a distinct characteristic of large mammal communities
in savannas over much of Africa that, although many
species might contribute to the cumulative biological
diversity in any area, the major biomass contribution
would be made by a limited number of species. Often
the entire large mammal community would be dominated
by two or three species e.g. elephant and buffalo. This
is the situation one would expect in the project area.
The fact that it is not present in the Caprivi gives
cause for ponder.
- Disease: With the exception
of rinderpest, the effects of the various
|

Table 3: Diseases affecting cattle and buffalo
|
diseases to which buffalo are susceptible (Table
3) are also relatively minor. Together, predation
and disease tend to be secondary factors acting on undernourished
animals (Pienaar 1969). Disease may differentially affect
juveniles but the resultant mortality is likely to cause
population fluctuations rather than any substantive
long term alterations to basic population growth rates
(Sinclair 1974b). Rinderpest is an exception - the whole
population is affected.
- Predation is a relatively minor factor (Sinclair
1974b).
|
|