-
Offtake exceeding 5%
-
Subsistance offtake -
sport
hunting
Illegal offtake
Levels of illegal hunting could affect the survival of
buffalo. Tagg, Mayes and Scheepers (pers.comm. 10/10/02)
state that significant illegal hunting is taking place.
A population
model for buffalo has been developed to explore the
maximum illegal harvest which a buffalo population of 3,000
could sustain. It is assumed that mortality would affect
both sexes and all ages equally.
|
| Illegal harvest % |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Rate of population growth % |
5.5 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
0.1 |
| Years to reach 10,000 animals |
24 |
29 |
37 |
54 |
154 |
563 |
|
Back to top
Offtake exceeding 5%
Under the rainfall conditions in the Caprivi (which set
female fecundity),
the population can sustain slightly more than a 5% offtake.
The higher the proportional offtake, the lower is the growth
rate of the population and, at a 5% offtake, it is effectively
stationary. To examine rates of population decline when
the harvest exceeds 5%, it is not useful to examine percentage
offtakes because these result in a lower and lower number
of animals being killed as the population declines so that
the population tends to stabilise at some low level.
A more realistic examination of rates of decline for unsustainable
harvests removes a fixed number from the population each
year which inevitably results in extinction. In the table
below, the number of years to extinction is shown for various
fixed offtakes from a starting population of 3,000 animals.
|
| Illegal harvest (% of 3,000 buffalo) |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
| Fixed annual offtake |
180 |
210 |
240 |
270 |
300 |
450 |
600 |
| Years to extinction |
46 |
28 |
21 |
17 |
14 |
8 |
6 |
|
Back to top
Subsistance offtake
The maximum sustained yield from a population capable of
growing at 5% per annum is about 5% and quotas should not
exceed this. Far more important is that legal hunting of
buffalo for 'own use' is financially and economically short-sighted.
The returns possible
from international sport hunting of buffalo are so much
higher than subsistence uses that there is no sense in pursuing
short-term lower valued options. Moreover, there are no
short-cuts in the process: there is no sex or age class
of the buffalo population which can be hunted for meat without
prejudicing the overall potential in the international safari
hunting market.
Back to top
Sport Hunting
The present trophy quota for buffalo (less than 10 in the
entire Caprivi) is unlikely to have any impact on the buffalo
population. If the population as a whole is about 3,000
animals it could tolerate a quota of some 90 trophy bulls.
If, as assumed in the
financial analysis for sport hunting in the Caprivi,
there is a 'huntable population' of about 1,000 animals
outside protected areas, a quota of 30 animals would be
sustainable.