Southern Savanna Buffalo >>

Numbers - Caprivi

- Carrying Capacity- Data Quality and Interpretation -

Namibia: Caprivi

The Namibian data indicate a resident population in the Caprivi of the order of 1,000 - 3,000 animals (Table 3).

Season
Type of survey
  Early Dry (Apr - June)   Late Dry (Jul - Sep)

Actual Sightings
* Standard Sample Survey

** Total Count
*** Unknown

  Early Wet (Oct-Dec)   Late Wet (Jan-Mar)
1977 1                
1978 2       8     8 EC: East of Kabe only
1979 2       0     0  
1980 0       1,071*     1,071  
        236*** 0*** 621*** 857 In: Rodwell et al (1995)
1981       19       19  
1982         549**   170 719  
        150***
217***
367 In: Rodwell et al (1995)
1983   0     80**   0 80  
1984 40       185** 8** 0 193  
1985   3 200*** 175 45** 228** 0 651 In: Rodwell et al (1995)
      93       93 WC: Doppies area only
1986   2   70 74 132   278 WC: Doppies area only
1987   11** 220 250 252**     733  
    250***         250 In: Rodwell et al (1995)
1988   120   0 237     357  
7**       24 515   539 EC: St Michel only
1989   207 0 7 140** 634**   988  
1990 0** 15 307     766 0 1088  
1991   4           4  
1992
64*
64  
1993   4** 380** 656**   625** 0 1665  
1994     401** 950**   1173** 2** 2526 In: Rodwell et al (1995)
  288**   1351     2* 1641  
    0*   0* 3018* 3018 ULG (1994)
1995 0* 2*       2523* 2 2527  
1996               0  
1997               0  
1998 0*   33*
422*
103* 0* 558*  
33* 98*     0* 104* 324* 526* Craig (1998)
1999               0  
2000 0* 500*           500  
Table 3: Survey results

 

Back to top

Potential carrying capacities for buffalo in the Caprivi

BUFFALO RANGE Area km2 Ceiling Density N/sq.km Final Buffalo Population Rounded Numbers Cumulative Population Years to reach this level
1. "Core areas" 5,250 2.0 10,500 10,000 10,000 25
2. "Medium Range" 3,982 1.2 4,778 5,000 15,000 33
3. "Maximum Range" 8,285 0.6 4,971 5,000 20,000 39

 

The relationship between carrying capacities and rainfall predicts that under a range of rainfall from 500-700mm as experienced in the Caprivi (Mendelsohn and Roberts 1997, p6), buffalo densities at carrying capacity will lie between 1-2 animals/km2.

The key factors which will determine buffalo numbers and distribution in the Caprivi fall largely outside the range of management activities undertaken within State Protected Areas and depend more on land use planning and veterinary control measures. Veterinary control measures impact on buffalo numbers and distribution and should form the major topic for discussion in bilateral talks with Botswana on buffalo management.

The exact designation and final boundaries of State Protected Conservation Areas in the Caprivi (Mendelsohn and Roberts 1997, p7; PW 1998) need to be resolved. Resolution of these issues will set the base line against which many other land use and conservation plans can be developed.

back to top

Data Quality and Interpretation

Nothing in the data suggests any marked influx of animals from Botswana at particular times of the year and this is unlikely to be demonstrated until a survey is carried out at the peak of the wet season and a modified survey technique is devised to overcome the present difficulty of buffalo surveys to support more accurate and precise buffalo population estimates is.

The data is based on the information in DSS (2002a) but has been updated with additional information from Rodwell (et al 1995), ULG (1994) and Craig (1998). The following observations apply to the data:

  1. The mix of survey techniques (sample surveys, total counts and actual sightings) preclude comparisons across the full data set.
  2. No confidence intervals are given for the sample surveys in DSS (2002a)and it should be tacitly understood that they are high (typically + 40-90% of the estimate).
  3. Despite the apparent plethora of data, there are few complete surveys of the entire Caprivi in any single year.
  4. The variation in the strata used within the Caprivi from survey to survey further reduces the value of comparisons.

Thus caution needs to be exercised in pronouncing apparent upward or downward trends in populations.