Southern Savanna Buffalo >>

Numbers - Monitoring

- Improving Buffalo Estimates - Monitoring law enforcement and illegal activity

The difficulty with buffalo surveys

Aerial surveys are not ideal for estimating buffalo populations. The errors which may arise from estimating numbers are potentially large. Present air survey techniques are not suited to detect a yearly increase of 5% in a buffalo population which was nominally 3,000 animals.There are no guarantees for air surveys that, even if they are carried out at exactly the same time of year, other variables (e.g. rainfall) may not affect the numbers of buffalo actually present in the Caprivi at the time The typical semi-random distribution of most large mammal species can be well captured by transects flown about 1km apart with a strip width of about 150m each side of the aircraft. The estimate which results from sightings which fall within the stripwidth is usually fairly precise with statistical confidence limits which can be better than + 20% of the value of the estimate.

Because buffalo occur in large herds which may exceed 500 animals and may cover a physical area which spans more than one adjacent transect line, the errors which may arise from estimating numbers are potentially large. For example, if the entire buffalo population in a particular survey stratum exists as one large herd of several hundred animals and that herd happens to fall outside the survey strip width, the estimate for the population is zero. If the herd fall entirely within the strip width, the estimate is high when the sample area is extrapolated to the total stratum area and there are no confidence intervals because of the single data point. A range of intermediate situations can arise, all of which give rise to the very large confidence intervals which are associated with buffalo estimates. A second problem is the inability of observers to make accurate estimates of numbers when confronted with very large groups - the general tendency is to underestimate (Sinclair 1973). The problem is exacerbated when a herd is partly in and partly out of the transect strip width and when the observer is called upon to make an estimate when moving at a forward speed of 100km/hour. At present there is no acceptable alternative to the standard transect survey method or the random block count method. Systems which rely on "total counts" or "actual observations" are statistically inferior because no accuracy or precision can be attached to the estimate.

Improving Buffalo Estimates

Gibson (pers.comm.) has proposed a method by which better estimates might be obtained for buffalo. On any survey buffalo will be encountered both in large herds and in small groups (usually 'bachelor' herds) and the standard air survey method is adequate to capture the smaller groups. To estimate the numbers in large groups a second aeroplane should fly above and behind the first at height such that it is surveying a strip width of about 1km either side of the transect line. The observers in the second aircraft are solely concerned with detecting large buffalo herds which, when encountered, are photographed and counted from the photograph after the survey. By the application of the same statistical methods, the large herds can be incorporated accurately within the census. Such a survey would be expensive but it need not be repeated very often.

Back to top

Monitoring law enforcement and illegal activity

Bell (1986) and Jachmann (1998) give excellent systems for monitoring law enforcement and illegal activity. The rationale underpinning the systems is that when no effort is applied to anti-poaching no illegal activity is detected and, as effort is increased in the early stages, an increasing amount of illegal activity is detected. At some point as effort continues to be increased, the amount of illegal activity actually decreases and, with further effort, it can be reduced to a level which is acceptable to wildlife managers and sustainable by wildlife populations (Figure 20).

It should be noted that illegal activity can seldom, if ever, be eliminated completely and increasing expenditure on this aspect of park management produces diminishing returns.

The objective of this monitoring is to detect whether the situation is deteriorating or improving over time and whether additional funds and effort have to be allocated to anti-poaching. However, there are other secondary spin-offs from such a system: it provides a comparative analysis amongst scouts of performance on patrols (which can be valuable for promotion purposes or for dismissal of malingerers), it can provide the basis for an incentive system and it can be combined with a basic field system for monitoring wildlife population numbers.

Law enforcement effort can be measured in several ways. The number of times a particular grid square (e.g. 5 x 5 km ) is visited provides one type of index and measuring the total distances walked in the course of patrols provides another. These are fairly crude measures which can be considerably improved by using a GPS to record actual distances travelled and locations visited.

Illegal activity requires to be quantified by developing an index which is appropriate for the park concerned and which weights various activities according to the severity with which they are viewed. Bell (1986, pages 326-329) gives a points system by which illegal activity can be scored and this could very easily be adapted to the needs of the different parks in the Caprivi. Reports of arrests, weapon confiscations and snares recovered are valueless unless organised into an index which can be plotted against patrol effort.

Both Bell and Jachmann emphasize the importance of sound patrol reporting systems and the time which must be spent on debriefing after patrols have been completed if the data collected are to have any validity. Jachmann also details the important rôle which carriers (labourers) play in improving the law enforcement performance and, in an analysis of illegal hunting in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia, it was found that the employment of carriers significantly reduced the illegal offtake of elephants

Back to top