Set sustainable hunting quotas, e.g. through an adaptive quota setting system (DSS 2002 pp60).

Sell safari hunting concessions to maximum advantage by:

Public auction: Minimises corruption and prices are higher than those obtained through a tender system.

Tenders: Unless the system for awarding tenders is transparent, corruption is frequently encountered.

Where conservancies or commercial farms abut onto State Protected Areas there may be a need to set quotas for the entire range.

There is a transboundary aspect to this same problem. In several instances it is clear that hunting trophies are coming from a population shared between Botswana and Namibia(e.g. Salambala Conservancy in Namibia and the Chobe Enclave community in Botswana).

Monitoring:

The annual record of revenues and incomes earned from safari hunting in State Protected Areas, conservancies and commercial farms will provide the information needed to assess the overall progress towards achieving the economic objective. It will be necessary to separate out from the data the portion of the income which is attributable to roan, sable and tsessebe.

All ecological objectives must be met;

Coordination and collaboration both at the national and transboundary levels;

National Institutions must be developed between the State and its neighbours which will enableequitable sharing of the overall proceeds when the hunting is taking place from a common population.

Workable transboundary institutions must be developed, which, in the first instance, result in cooperation on quota setting and, ultimately, lead to income sharing.