Roan, Sable, Tsessebe >>

Distribution - Regional

Figure 6: Roan distribution in relation to annual rainfall

Figure 7: Sable distribution in relation to annual rainfall

Figure 8: Tsessebe distribution in relation to annual rainfall

The data (ASG 1998a) on distribution of roan (Figure 6), sable (Figure 7) and tsessebe (Figure 8) in southern Africa in relation to average annual rainfall show that

  • There are no 'naturally' occurring populations of roan, sable or tsessebe below the 400mm rainfall isohyet;
  • Apart from a very few minor introduced populations of sable and tsessebe elsewhere in the region, Namibia is the only southern African country attempting to maintain populations of roan, sable and tsessebe in areas where the average rainfall is below 400mm.

    Introduced populations of sable and tsessebe below the 400mm rainfall isohyet, occur on private land in the vicinity of the Limpopo River in the northern province of South Africa and in the Beit Bridge area of Zimbabwe, and there is an introduced population of tsessebe in the Vaalbos National Park near Kimberley in South Africa.

    The African Antelope Specialist Group (ASG 1998) remark that the populations of roan, sable and tsessebe in Namibia are outside of the species' 'natural range'.

  • Many of the 'crashes' in roan, sable and tsessebe populations have occurred in areas where the average annual rainfall is close to the lower limit.
Mills, Biggs and Whyte (1995) concluded that rainfall was the principal determinant of numbers of common ungulates in southern African savannas. This fundamental constraint appears to receive too little emphasis in the plethora of proposed research studies and management measures designed to address the declines in roan, sable and tsessebe in parts of southern Africa (e.g. Grant and van der Walt 2000, Grant et al 2002, Harrington 1995, Harrington et al 1999, RARE 2002 and numerous other references). Dunham and Robertson (2001) demonstrate very clearly that rainfall accounts for the observed declines in tsessebe populations in Kruger National Park yet there appears to be a reluctance to accept this too-simple finding or apply it to other 'rare species' populations.