Neighbouring countries
The countries neighbouring Namibia with populations of roan, sable
and tsessebe are Angola, Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe. No data
is to hand for Zambia and Angola.
Botswana
ULG (1995) produced pooled estimates of the northern Botswana
roan, sable and tsessebe populations which can be compared with
the estimates for the Caprivi in 1994 when two comprehensive surveys
were carried out.
| |
Roan |
Sable |
Tsessebe |
Area |
| Estimate |
1,357 |
3,138 |
10,015 |
145,605 km2 |
| Confidence intervals |
+- 49 % |
+- 35 % |
+- 22 % |
|
| Density (km2/animal) |
107 |
46 |
15 |
|
| Caprivi population (1994) |
197 |
1,200 |
206 |
20,000 km2 |
| Percentage of Botswana figures |
15 % |
38 % |
2 % |
14 % |
Back to top
Data Quality and interpretation - Botswana
The wildlife authorities in Botswana have systematically carried
out nation-wide aerial surveys of large mammals in both dry and
wet seasons for most years since 1987.
The overall densities of the three species are very low in both
Botswana and Namibia. In relation to the areas involved, in 1994
the Namibian sable population was at a higher density than the Botswana
population, the roan population was more or less at the same density
and the tsessebe population was at a much lower density. It is perhaps
to be expected that tsessebe numbers in northern Botswana would
be high because of the optimum habitats in the vicinity of the Okavango
Swamps. Movements of animals between Botswana and the Caprivi are
likely to be at their lowest during the dry season and, therefore,
the dry season estimates for the Caprivi are probably indicative
of the size of the "permanently resident" populations.
Back to top
Zimbabwe
The linkages between the roan, sable and tsessebe populations in
north-west Zimbabwe and the Caprivi are more tenuous than those
of Botswana-Namibia 'axis'. The survey results are only presented
in the context of a long term vision for a trans-frontier conservation
area where these species populations are able to move freely between
Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe. The realities of the present situation
are that although veterinary control fences do not theoretically
prevent movements of Zimbabwe wildlife westwards into northern Botswana,only
minor movements have been recorded. This may be because the physical
gap between the international boundary and the nearest permanent
water supplies in Chobe National Park is sufficiently large to deter
most movement except in the wet season. Beyond that, the access
for Zimbabwean animals to the eastern end of the Caprivi is barred
by relatively dense human settlement.
|
Year
|
Roan
|
Sable
|
Tsessebe
|
|
1989
|
213
|
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
|
|
1991
|
|
7,484
|
|
|
1992
|
31
|
12,713
|
-
|
|
1993
|
32
|
6,598
|
7
|
|
1994
|
218
|
5,356
|
-
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
|
1997
|
113
|
5,613
|
|
|
1998
|
806
|
5,424
|
-
|
|
1999
|
315
|
5,636
|
316
|
|
2000
|
-
|
survey
|
|
|
2001
|
292
|
5,854
|
80
|
Back to top
Data Quality and interpretation - Zimbabwe
Sample count aerial surveys have been consistently and regularly
carried out in north-western Matabeleland area of Zimbabwe since
1980.
Roan:The roan population in Matabeleland North was estimated
at over 1,000 animals in the early 1980s. Since then it has declined
drastically. The confidence intervals on the surveys in 1998 and
1999 are such that there is no significant difference between the
two estimates. The present population is thought to be about 300
animals.
Sable: Numbers have remained fairly constant at about 5-6,000
animals. The areas of basalt soils in Matabeleland North provide
optimum habitats for sable and the Matetsi Safari Area is renowned
for its consistently high hunting trophy quality.
Tsessebe: Prior to 1995, aerial surveys in Matabeleland
North focussed almost entirely on elephant, buffalo and sable, which
explains the absence of any meaningful data for tsessebe which have
never been abundant in this region.
The estimates for the three species permit little speculation
about relationships with long term cumulative surpluses and
deficits in rainfall - perhaps because the region enjoys a
relatively high rainfall like Katima Mulilo (usually above
500mm).
|