|
Co-management
presents a new challenge and, given the impressive record
of development of the wildlife industry and the positive spirit
of co-operation amongst the State, NGOs and private sector
towards larger goals, there is no reason why Namibia should
not lead the way in southern Africa in developing these new
forms of institutions. The nature of this co-management cannot
be one in which the State plays a central rôle and the other
players are co-opted as unwilling partners: it has to be one
where the geographic boundaries are identified and the stakeholders
within that zone jointly grapple with the problems on an equal
footing and with equal status (Ruitenbeek and Cartier 2001).
The present mosaic of parks, conservancies and commercial
farms provide a sound and essential foundation for the scaling
up of institutions (Murphree 2000) and, as they stand, partnerships
can be entered into amongst neighbours. But there is a difference
between partnerships and full co-management institutions.
In a co-management situation the state's rôle is very different
from the 'Command-and-control' function it has hitherto displayed.
The operating point on the management continuum defined by
Ruitenbeek & Cartier (2001) should be close to the laissez
faire end of the spectrum.
|