|

Figure 14: Elephant population estimates for Khaudum
and Nyae Nyae

Figure 15: Elephant population estimates for the Caprivi

Download Elephant estimates for Namibia
|
Khaudum National Park and Nyae Nyae Conservancy
The earliest surveys of Khaudum were in the mid-1970s when
numbers were less than 100 animals (Figure
14). Survey areas have altered over the period 1977-2004
and the later estimates include areas outside the national
park and the conservancy. As the elephant population has increased
larger and larger areas have been included in each survey.
Although this section is titled "Khaudum National Park and
Nyae Nyae Conservancy" the data should be taken to include
all elephants in the eastern part of Kavango and Otjozondupa
provinces.
The most recent surveys estimate the eastern Kavango population
(including Khaudum) at slightly less than 4,000 animals (Kolberg
2004) and the eastern Otjozondupa population at almost 1,000
animals (Stander 2004). Numbers such as these could not have
been achieved through normal population growth. Martin's model
(2005) suggests that a starting population of 80 animals in
1977 would have reached less than 300 animals by 2005 growing
at a rate of about 5%.
Martin (2005) used the model to find the amount of immigration
needed to best fit the population estimates. He
assumed that the population grows at 4.56% and that all
the population estimates need to be increased by 25% to approximate
the true numbers in the population. The initial population
in 1975, the initial immigration and rate of change of immigration
have been simultaneously iterated to obtain the best fit.
This is obtained with a starting population of zero in 1975,
an initial immigration of 34 animals and in each year after
1975 the immigration increases by 7.14%. This implies an annual
immigration in the year 2004 of 251 animals.
The Caprivi
The estimates for the Caprivi population are given together
with alternative population models for the period 1977-2004
(Figure
15). A feature of the data is the number of years with
incomplete surveys - making it difficult to develop robust
population models.
Despite the 'noisy' nature of the data, the best fit to the
series of estimates is a scenario where the population declined
from 1977 to 1989, a major immigration of animals took place
in 1990 and, since then, the population has increased at normal
growth rates to reach its current levels.
The most recent estimate for the population is 8,726 animals
(Kolberg 2004). In 2003, Griffin & Chase (2004) estimated
the population at 5,740 animals and, taking these two estimates
in isolation, it would appear that some substantial recent
immigration has occurred.
|